Build controlled workflows with practical AI.

Quenos.ai designs AI-assisted tools for teams working with complex documents, standards, evidence, and technical decisions — with explicit limits, human review, traceability, and practical deployment constraints.

Document intelligenceSearch, summarize, compare, and cite information from controlled document sets, standards, and internal knowledge bases.

Workflow automationAutomate repetitive review, reporting, and evidence-handling tasks with explicit human approval points.

Controlled deliveryVersion control, logging, evaluation sets, traceability, known limitations, and review workflows designed in from the start.

What we help with.

Scoping AI-assisted engineering, compliance, and knowledge workflows.
Building controlled document-search, citation, and evidence-review systems.
Designing human-in-the-loop review, audit trails, evaluation sets, and release controls.

What we do not claim.

No generic ISO 26262 compliance claim for AI tools.
No claim that AI output is authoritative without bounded use, cited evidence, and review.
No promise that production-ready, validated systems are delivered in “days, not weeks.”

Framing an ISO 26262 tool-confidence argument for AI-assisted engineering tools.

A non-deterministic AI tool should not be presented as generically ISO 26262 compliant. This article explains how a bounded Clause 11 tool-confidence argument can be structured, where Clause 12-style evidence may help, and why validation, configuration control, human review, and assessor alignment remain essential.

Read the article →